Author + information
- Fernando Civeira, MD, President of the Spanish Atherosclerosis Society∗ (, )
- Juan Ascaso, MD, Elected President of the Spanish Atherosclerosis Society and
- Luis Masana, MD, President of the Scientific Committee of the Spanish Atherosclerosis Society
- ↵∗Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Paseo Isabel La Catolica 1-3, Zaragoza 50009, Spain
The U.S. National Cholesterol Education Program Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults recommendations (1) have had a huge impact on the treatment of hypercholesterolemia around the world and have had a decisive influence on all recommendations worldwide. Until now, the recommendations were based on lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) as the treatment goal. The accumulated information for more than 100 years built the “lipid theory of atherosclerosis” (2), and the recommendations fit well with that scientific knowledge: lowering LDL-C reduces cardiovascular risk by reducing atherosclerosis, and LDL-C lowering is, therefore, the objective. Over the years, as the evidence from clinical trials has emerged, LDL-C goal levels have been reduced and the population subsidiaries of reduction benefit have been expanding. The results have been dramatic and the reduction of cardiovascular disease in many countries reflects this (3).
The recently published “2013 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Treatment of Blood Cholesterol to Reduce Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Risk in Adults” (4) has substantially changed the message. What is important, according to the new guideline, is to prescribe statins, and cholesterol reduction is a consequence, not the goal, of treatment. The guidelines have gone from a low-density lipoprotein–focused vision to a vision focused only on statins. They forget lipid goals, the concentration of cholesterol in the monitoring of patients, and, ultimately, all evidence of the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. The document concentrates only on 1 type of evidence, which comes from randomized clinical trials. It should be remembered that not all scientific evidence comes from randomized clinical trials, and that we will never be able to have solid evidence for many patients excluded from the trials. What are we to do with a diabetic patient of age 60 years, with a personal history of coronary disease and with LDL-C 130 mg/dl after maximally-tolerated doses of statins? The document tells us to do nothing to further reduce his LDL-C. We believe that the scientific knowledge is misinterpreted, and a large group of patients is being unreasonably discriminated against. In contrast, the document indicates that we should prescribe high-intensity statin treatment in an otherwise healthy woman of 21 years, with LDL-C 190 mg/dl and, for example, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol 90 mg/dl. Even the document supports the use of a second or third nonstatin lipid-lowering drug to further lower her LDL-C; however, it refuses this approach to our diabetic patient.
The document has, according to the Spanish Atherosclerosis Society, many positive aspects: the systematic review of the literature, the definition of the groups susceptible to treatment, the classification of the statins' effects, and the new calculation of cardiovascular risk. However, the uncertainty and nihilism in many important issues is worrisome and may harm many patients; leaving behind the concept of intensive reduction of LDL-C will confuse many doctors; and focusing on statins will be detrimental to the investigation and development of other lipid-lowering drugs. For these reasons, the Spanish Society of Arteriosclerosis does not support this document and better recommends the guidelines from the European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society (5).
Please note: Dr. Civeira has received a research grant from Merck; consulting fees from Sanofi-Aventis; and honoraria from Merck and Amgen. Dr. Ascaso has received lecture and advisory board fees from AstraZeneca, Merck, Lilly, Novartis, Recordati, Esteve, Ferrer, Novonordisk, and Danone. Dr. Masana has received lecture and advisory board fees from AMGEM, Sanofi, Merck, Danone, Esteve, and Kowa.
- 2014 American College of Cardiology Foundation
- National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III)
- Go A.S.,
- Mozaffarian D.,
- Roger V.L.,
- et al.,
- for the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee
- Stone N.J.,
- Robinson J.,
- Lichtenstein A.H.,
- et al.
- Perk J.,
- De Backer G.,
- Gohlke H.,
- et al.