Author + information
- Received February 14, 2018
- Revision received March 1, 2018
- Accepted March 2, 2018
- Published online May 21, 2018.
- Joseph M. Bumgarner, MDa,
- Cameron T. Lambert, MDa,
- Ayman A. Hussein, MDa,
- Daniel J. Cantillon, MDa,
- Bryan Baranowski, MDa,
- Kathy Wolski, MPHb,
- Bruce D. Lindsay, MDa,
- Oussama M. Wazni, MD, MBAa and
- Khaldoun G. Tarakji, MD, MPHa,∗ ()
- aDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
- bCleveland Clinic Coordinating Center for Clinical Research (C5Research), Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
- ↵∗Address for correspondence:
Dr. Khaldoun G. Tarakji, Section of Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, J2-2, Cleveland, Ohio 44195.
Background The Kardia Band (KB) is a novel technology that enables patients to record a rhythm strip using an Apple Watch (Apple, Cupertino, California). The band is paired with an app providing automated detection of atrial fibrillation (AF).
Objectives The purpose of this study was to examine whether the KB could accurately differentiate sinus rhythm (SR) from AF compared with physician-interpreted 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs) and KB recordings.
Methods Consecutive patients with AF presenting for cardioversion (CV) were enrolled. Patients underwent pre-CV ECG along with a KB recording. If CV was performed, a post-CV ECG was obtained along with a KB recording. The KB interpretations were compared to physician-reviewed ECGs. The KB recordings were reviewed by blinded electrophysiologists and compared to ECG interpretations. Sensitivity, specificity, and K coefficient were measured.
Results A total of 100 patients were enrolled (age 68 ± 11 years). Eight patients did not undergo CV as they were found to be in SR. There were 169 simultaneous ECG and KB recordings. Fifty-seven were noninterpretable by the KB. Compared with ECG, the KB interpreted AF with 93% sensitivity, 84% specificity, and a K coefficient of 0.77. Physician interpretation of KB recordings demonstrated 99% sensitivity, 83% specificity, and a K coefficient of 0.83. Of the 57 noninterpretable KB recordings, interpreting electrophysiologists diagnosed AF with 100% sensitivity, 80% specificity, and a K coefficient of 0.74. Among 113 cases where KB and physician readings of the same recording were interpretable, agreement was excellent (K coefficient = 0.88).
Conclusions The KB algorithm for AF detection supported by physician review can accurately differentiate AF from SR. This technology can help screen patients prior to elective CV and avoid unnecessary procedures.
AliveCor provided the Kardia Band monitors that were connected to an Apple Watch and paired via Bluetooth to a smartphone device for utilization in the study. AliveCor was not involved in the design, implementation, data analysis, or manuscript preparation of the study. Dr. Hussein has served as a consultant for Abbott and Biosense Webster. Dr. Cantillon has served as a consultant for Abbott, Boston Scientific, Stryker Sustainability, and LifeWatch. Dr. Wazni has received a speaker honorarium from Spectranetics. Dr. Tarakji has served on the medical advisory board of Medtronic and AliveCor. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.
- Received February 14, 2018.
- Revision received March 1, 2018.
- Accepted March 2, 2018.
- 2018 American College of Cardiology Foundation
This article requires a subscription or purchase to view the full text. If you are a subscriber or member, click Login or the Subscribe link (top menu above) to access this article.