Models^{†} | Wald p Value | HR | 95% CI | Log Likelihood Ratio | Chi-Square Difference^{‡} | Likelihood Ratio Test p Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

Baseline | 3,423.66 | |||||

Models with LVEDV | ||||||

LVEDV indexed by BSA, per 10 ml/m^{2} | <0.001 | 1.09 | 1.05–1.12 | 3,405.21 | 18.46 | <0.001 |

LVEDV indexed by BSA, per 10 ml/m^{2} | 0.096 | 1.04 | 0.99–1.09 | 3,397.41 | 26.26 | <0.001 |

RWT, per 0.01-U decrement | 0.005 | 1.08 | 1.02–1.15 | 0.005 | ||

Models with LVESV | ||||||

LVESV indexed by BSA, per 10 ml/m^{2} | <0.001 | 1.10 | 1.06–1.15 | 3,405.87 | 17.80 | <0.001 |

LVESV indexed by BSA, per 10 ml/m^{2} | 0.134 | 1.05 | 0.99–1.11 | 3,397.93 | 25.73 | <0.001 |

RWT, per 0.01-U decrement | 0.005 | 1.09 | 1.03–1.15 | 0.005 | ||

Models with LVEF | ||||||

LVEF, %, per unit percentage | 0.021 | 0.96 | 0.93–0.99 | 3,418.42 | 5.24 | 0.022 |

LVEF, %, per unit percentage | 0.979 | 1.00 | 0.96–1.04 | 3,400.11 | 23.55 | <0.001 |

RWT, per 0.01-U decrement | <0.001 | 1.12 | 1.06–1.17 | <0.001 | ||

Models with LAV | ||||||

LAV indexed by BSA, per 10 ml/m^{2} | <0.001 | 1.23 | 1.10–1.38 | 3,411.03 | 12.63 | <0.001 |

LAV indexed by BSA, per 10 ml/m^{2} | 0.153 | 1.10 | 0.97–1.25 | 3,398.11 | 25.55 | <0.001 |

RWT, per 0.01-U decrement | <0.001 | 1.10 | 1.04–1.15 | <0.001 | ||

Models with LV mass | ||||||

LV mass indexed by BSA, per 10 g/m^{2} | 0.125 | 1.05 | 0.99–1.12 | 3,421.38 | 2.29 | 0.130 |

LV mass indexed by BSA, per 10 g/m^{2} | 0.43 | 1.03 | 0.96–1.09 | 3,399.50 | 24.16 | <0.001 |

RWT, per 0.01-U decrement | <0.001 | 1.11 | 1.06–1.16 | <0.001 |

Abbreviations as in Tables 1 and 2.

↵∗ Values added to the baseline multivariate model alone and together with RWT.

↵† Findings regarding risk associated with each echocardiographic parameter were obtained from separate models, each adjusted for the following covariates: treatment arm, female sex, glomerular filtration rate, previous myocardial infarction, New York Heart Association functional class, QRS duration ≥150 ms, SBP, previous VA, and age at enrollment.

↵‡ The chi-square difference was calculated by deducting the chi-square of each model from the chi-square of the baseline model (83.30).