Author + information
- Received August 18, 1994
- Revision received March 3, 1995
- Accepted March 9, 1995
- Published online August 1, 1995.
- Thomas H. Marwick, MD, FACC1,
- Terry Anderson, MD,
- M.John Williams, MD,
- Brian Haluska, RDMS,
- Jacques A. Melin, MD,
- Fredric Pashkow, MD and
- James D. Thomas, MD, FACC
- ↵1Address for correspondence: Dr. Thomas H. Marwick, Department of Cardiology, F15, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio 44195 USA
Objectives. This study compared the accuracy and cost implications of using exercise echocardiography and exercise electrocardiography for detection of coronary artery disease in women.
Background. The specificity of exercise electrocardiography in women is lower than in men. Exercise echocardiography accurately identifies coronary artery disease in women, but its utility in place of exercise electrocardiography is unclear.
Methods. One hundred sixty-one women without a previous Q wave infarction underwent exercise echocardiography and coronary angiography. Positive findings were a new or worsening wall motion abnormality on the exercise echocardiogram and ST segment depression >0.1 mV at 0.08 s after the J point on the exercise electrocardiogram (ECG).
Results. Coronary artery stenosis >50% diameter narrowing was present in 59 patients; the sensitivity (mean ± SD) of exercise echocardiography was 80 ± 3%. In 48 patients with an interpretable ECG, the sensitivity of exercise echocardiography was 81 ±4%, and that of the exercise ECG was 77 ± 3% (p = 0.50). In 102 patients without coronary artery disease, the overall specificity of exercise echocardiography was 81 ± 4%. In 70 patients with an interpretable ECG, the specificity of exercise echocardiography (80 ± 3%) exceeded that of the exercise ECG (56 ± 4%, p < 0.0004). The accuracy of exercise echocardiography was also greater than exercise electrocardiography (81 ± 5% vs. 64 ± 6%, p < 0.005). Exercise echocardiography stratified significantly more patients of intermediate (20% to 80%) pretest disease probability into the high (>80%) or low (<20%) posttest probability group. In women without a previous exercise ECG, the specificity of exercise echocardiography continued to exceed that of exercise electrocardiography (80 ± 3% vs. 64 ± 3%, p = 0.05). Exercise echocardiography had the best balance between accuracy and cost for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease in women.
Conclusions. Exercise echocardiography is more specific than exercise electrocardiography for diagnosis of coronary artery disease in women and is a cost-effective approach to the diagnosis of coronary artery disease because of the avoidance of inappropriate angiography.
☆ This study was presented in part at the 67th Scientific Sessions of the American Heart Association, Dallas, Texas, November 1994.
- Received August 18, 1994.
- Revision received March 3, 1995.
- Accepted March 9, 1995.