|Reviewer||Employment||Research Grant||Other Research Support||Speakers Bureau/Honoraria||Expert Witness||Ownership Interest||Consultant/Advisory Board||Other|
|Michael S. Emery||Greenville Health System||None||None||None||None||None||None||None|
|Michelle E. Grenier||University of Mississippi||None||None||None||None||None||None||None|
|Carolyn A. Hempel||University at Buffalo School of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences||None||None||None||None||None||None||None|
|James E. Tisdale||Purdue University||American Heart Association Grant in Aid†; Indiana Clinical Translational Sciences Institute†||None||None||None||None||None||None|
This table represents the relationships of reviewers that may be perceived as actual or reasonably perceived conflicts of interest as reported on the Disclosure Questionnaire, which all reviewers are required to complete and submit. A relationship is considered to be “significant” if (a) the person receives $10,000 or more during any 12-month period, or 5% or more of the person’s gross income; or (b) the person owns 5% or more of the voting stock or share of the entity, or owns $10,000 or more of the fair market value of the entity. A relationship is considered to be “modest” if it is less than “significant” under the preceding definition.