Author + information
- Received April 10, 2020
- Revision received April 30, 2020
- Accepted May 4, 2020
- Published online May 8, 2020.
- Division of Cardiology and Department of Bioethics and Humanities, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
- ↵∗Correspondence: James N. Kirkpatrick, MD Professor of Medicine, Cardiology and Bioethics and Humanities (adjunct) Section Chief, Cardiovascular Imaging Director, Echocardiography, University of Washington Chair, Ethics Committee, University of Washington Medical Center 1959 Pacific St. Seattle, WA 98195 Phone: 206-598-4641 Fax: 206-744-8538, .
- Sarah C. Hull, MD, MBE
- Savitri Fedson, MD, MA
- Brendan Mullen, BSFS
- Sarah J. Goodlin, MD
The COVID-19 pandemic and its sequelae have created scenarios of scarce medical resources, leading to the prospect that healthcare systems have faced or will face difficult decisions about triage, allocation and reallocation. These decisions should be guided by ethical principles and values, should not be made before crisis standards have been declared by authorities, and, in most cases, will not be made by bedside clinicians. Do not attempt resuscitation (DNAR) and withholding and withdrawing decisions should be made according to standard determination of medical appropriateness and futility, but there are unique considerations during a pandemic. Transparent and clear communication is crucial, coupled with dedication to provide the best possible care to patients, including palliative care. As medical knowledge about COVID-19 grows, more will be known about prognostic factors that can guide these difficult decisions.
Disclosures: The authors declare no relevant disclosures.
- Received April 10, 2020.
- Revision received April 30, 2020.
- Accepted May 4, 2020.